Drawing for IT'S SO CALIFORNIA

USPTO serial 76415783

IT'S SO CALIFORNIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT'S SO CALIFORNIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dwight L. Armstrong

MATTHEW A SUMROW MCQUEEN & ASHMAN LLP19900 MACARTHURE BLVD STE 1150IRVINE, CT 92612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS, JACKETS, CAPS, HATS, AND HEADWEARACTIVEFeb 28, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 25, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance