USPTO serial 76416218
LANDMARK PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LANDMARK PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A COHEN
MICHAEL A COHEN SCHWABE WILLIAMSON & WYATT1211 SW 5TH AVEPACWEST CTR STE 1600-1900PORTLAND, OR 97204-3795Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distribution, import and export, and value added reseller of non-metallic building materials for use in construction and further manufacturing, namely-- lumber; plywood; particle board; fiberboard; laminated plastic sheets; panels; siding; shutters; trim; veneers; roofing materials; exterior stucco products; house wraps and thermal insulating sheathing products; prefabricated furniture components; adhesive tape; caulking; sealants; and adhesives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |