USPTO serial 76416865
CON-WAY FULL LOAD VALUE ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2003
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CON-WAY FULL LOAD VALUE ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Gray IV,
ANDREW J GRAY IV MORGAN LEWIS BOCKIUS LLP2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 700, 3000 EL CPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized tracking of documents, packages, raw materials, and other freight for others over computer networks, Intranets, and the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transportation services, namely, pick-up, packing, storage, transportation, and delivery of the goods of others by air, rail, ship or truck; freight forwarding services; and freight transportation brokerage services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CNF Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CNF Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CON-WAY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CNF Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named CON-WAY FULL LOAD VALUE ZONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |