Drawing for Serial No. 76417102

USPTO serial 76417102

Serial No. 76417102

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76417102?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K Kalan

KEITH RAYLE KER, INCORPORATED906 E 5TH AVELONGMONT, CO 80501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs, namely, security software used for determination of and protection against unauthorized use of files, and for virus protectionACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer programs, namely, security software used for determination of and protection against unauthorized use of files, and for virus protectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 2005UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 21, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Jun 17, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance