USPTO serial 76417359
MP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 124-8511, JP
Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 124-8511, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Berridge
WILLIAM P BERRIDGE OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, games and amusement machines, namely, hand-held units for playing electronic games, board games, card games, action skill games, manipulative games, arcade games, toy trains, toy cars, musical toys, plush toys and stuffed toy animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |