USPTO serial 76417366
SHARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shark Abrasion Systems Pty Ltd
Western Australia 6166, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Earthmoving equipment namely mechanical excavators and loaders; ground engaging tools for use with mechanical diggers and loader namely shrouds, lips, adaptors and teeth | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |