USPTO serial 76417386
GYROSCOPE DESIGN (CLOSED)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - REVIEW AND AMENDMENT
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GYROSCOPE DESIGN (CLOSED)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN P. BECHTOLD
KAREN P BECHTOLD KOS PHARMACEUTICALS INC1 CEDAR BROOK DRCRANBURY, NJ 08512UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed materials, namely, brochures, pamphlets, leaflets, booklets, mailings and print advertisements in publications/magazines, featuring health information about and treatments for lipid disorders, arteriosclerosis, and cardiovascular diseases | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |