Drawing for CONCERTWORKS

USPTO serial 76417623

CONCERTWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCERTWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Priscilla Maye Kugel

PRISCILLA MAYE KUGEL SMITH, STRATTON, WISE, HEHER600 COLLEGE RD EPRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio cassettes, compact discs, digital video discs and videotapes featuring performances by musical artistsACTIVE—
038Audio and video broadcasting, namely broadcasting of the musical performances of others via a global computer network; and audio and video streaming, namely, content delivery of live and recorded audio and video musical performances of others via a global computer network; telecommunications services, namely, broadcasting of concerts via a global computer network; transmission of audio and video streaming of live and recorded musical performances via a global computer network; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning musical artists, events and concerts; and providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning musical artists, events and concertsACTIVE—
041entertainment services, namely, providing live musical performances and a photo gallery of musical events and artists via a global computer network; and organizing exhibitions for entertainment purposes featuring live performances by musical artists via a global computer network; hosting of digital content on the Internet, namely, live performances by musical artists; computer services, namely, providing databases featuring musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 8, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance