USPTO serial 76417875
NATURALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Olivar de los Padres, 01780, MX
Olivar de los Padres, 01780, MX
Zazueta, Valentin Martinez Gama
Olivar de los Padres, 01780, MX
Zazueta, Valentin Martinez Gama
Olivar de los Padres, 01780, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Abrams
DAVID S ABRAMS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1300 19TH ST N W STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea drinks, namely, tea, iced tea, tea flavored with fruit, excluding coffee substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zazueta, Pablo Martinez Gama
- Other trademarks owned by Zazueta, Pablo Martinez Gama
- Other trademarks owned by Zazueta, Valentin Martinez Gama
- Other trademarks owned by Zazueta, Valentin Martinez Gama
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NATURALIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |