USPTO serial 76418237
TOM TOM BY THOMAS KOSTRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOM TOM BY THOMAS KOSTRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
A-1090 Vienna, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl Hormann, Esq.
KARL HORMANN ESQ LAW OFFICE OF KARL HORMANNP O BOX 381516CAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic jerseys and uniforms, aprons, belts (clothing), bibs made of cloth, coats, footwear, gloves, hats, jackets, jogging suits, mittens, nightgowns, nightshirts, pyjamas, smocks (artists') T-shirts, tank tops, shorts, socks, sweatshirts, underwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |