Drawing for REGALI

USPTO serial 76418337

REGALI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REGALI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005First aid kitsACTIVE—
009Safety kits for use in roadside assistance, for maintenance and repair of vehicles, and for passenger safety comprised of booster cables, emergency signal, flashlight, and first aid materials; survival kit for outdoor survival and disaster relief comprised of compass, whistle, flashlight, matches, candle, emergency hand tools, emergency blanket, and first aid materials; travel accessories, namely, cellular phone holders, personal digital assistant cases, CD casesACTIVE—
018Travel accessories, namely, all-purpose sports bags for travel, travel wallets, travel pouches, travel organizers for toiletries sold empty, travel fanny packs, travel waist bags, document cases, briefcase-type portfoliosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 4, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 2, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2005LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Apr 1, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 23, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance