USPTO serial 76418439
XCEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XCEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Clarke
RICHARD D CLARKE LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD D CLARKE3755 AVOCADO BLVD #1000LA MESA, CA 91941-7301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | paintball equipment and protective gear for playing paintball, namely, paintball gun barrels, elbow pads, knee pads, and gloves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |