USPTO serial 76418541
LIGHTNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIGHTNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Frankfort, IL
West Frankfort, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ned W. Randle, Reg. No. 35,989
NED W RANDLE POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESI, L12412 POWERSCOURT DR STE 200SAINT LOUIS, MO 63131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Boats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |