Drawing for BREATH BUSTERS

USPTO serial 76418857

BREATH BUSTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BREATH BUSTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William G. Bruns

WILLIAM G BRUNS POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESISTE 20012412 POWERSCOURT DRST LOUIS, MO 63131

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medicated breath freshening strips for human useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 1, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 5, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Feb 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 19, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 20, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance