USPTO serial 76418866
PHIL NATURNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHIL NATURNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric S. Hyman
ERIC S HYMAN BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, perfumes, cosmetic soaps and hair lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | eyebrow brushes, cheek brushes, eye shadow brushes, mascara combs, compacts sold empty, lip brushes, powder puffs, cosmetic brushes and foundation sponges for applying makeup; cosmetic utensils, namely powder compact not of precious metal, powder puffs and toilet sponges | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |