CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SPEEDPROOF RINGS

USPTO serial 76418960

SPEEDPROOF RINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEEDPROOF RINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginia L. Carron

VIRGINIA L CARRON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tires; pneumatic, semi-pneumatic and solid tires for vehicle wheels; wheels for vehicles, inner tubes, wheel rims for vehicle tires and replacement parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—
035Advertising services for others in the field of tiresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2007ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 21, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 21, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 21, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 13, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 9, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 10, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 29, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance