USPTO serial 76418965
LES PARFUMS JEAN LOUIS SCHERRER IMMENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LES PARFUMS JEAN LOUIS SCHERRER IMMENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75008 Paris, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON SCHULTZ DOUGHERTY & MACDONALD1727 KING ST STE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toiletry and soap preparations for men and women, namely, astringents for cosmetic use, toilet soaps, face packs and make up; perfumery; fragrances; essential oil for personal use; cosmetics; hair lotions; essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; hair lotions; eau de toilette; talcum powder; body sprays; shower gels; dentifrices; cologne; after shave balm; body moisturizer and cream; perfumed soap and gel; and dusting powder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |