USPTO serial 76419333
R & B FILTRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2003
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with R & B FILTRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Polacek
J ALBERT RIDDLE BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED#12003900 ESSEX LNHOUSTON, TX 77027Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | industrial machine presses, namely filter presses and belt filter presses, and replacement parts thereof, namely press plates and frames; drying machines for use in drying sewage sludge; conveyors, namely sludge and scraper conveyors; and sludge pumps and waste water pumps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1983 |
| 009 | automatic shut-off valves, electrical switches, electrical relays, electronic controllers, electrical control panels, switchboards, laboratory filter presses, laboratory membrane filter presses for use in the waste water treatment field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1983 |
| 042 | architectural and civil engineering services in the waste water treatment industry; construction drafting in the waste water treatment industry; and technical consultation in the waste water treatment industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Baker Hughes (Deutschland) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Baker Hughes (Deutschland) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Baker Hughes (Deutschland) GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named R & B FILTRATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |