Drawing for Serial No. 76419385

USPTO serial 76419385

Serial No. 76419385

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76419385?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth S. Roberts

KENNETH S ROBERTS ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP4 PARTK PLZ STE 1600IRVINE, CA 92614-2558UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services for wireless telecommunications carriers, namely business planning and identifying sites for antennas and cellsites; retail store services in the field of wireless telecommunications products; business services, namely obtaining building permits and approval for antenna and cellsite construction and installation from governments, government agencies, and public servicesACTIVE—
036Real estate affairs and land acquisition services for wireless telecommunications carriers, namely acquisition and zoning of sites for antennas and cellsite construction, leasing and licensing of sites, and negotiating leases and licensesACTIVE—
037building construction and installation services, namely supervision of construction and installation of antennas and cellsites for wireless communication carriersACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely providing wireless communications servicesACTIVE—
042legal services, namely, zoning, negotiating leases and licenses, obtaining building permits and approvals for antenna and cellsite construction and installation from governments, government agencies, and public utilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance