Drawing for CHAIRMAN'S CHOICE

USPTO serial 76419467

CHAIRMAN'S CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHAIRMAN'S CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Schott

Stephen B. Schott Volpe and Koenig, P.C.30 S. 17th Street, Suite 1600Philadelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006security devices, namely, metal anti-theft locksACTIVE—
009security devices, namely, computer security software for managing, monitoring and controlling data access in computers located in residential dwellings and commercial buildingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 23, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance