USPTO serial 76419482
FM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Handler
JENNIFER V WHITING LINER YANKELEVITZ SUNSHINE & REGENSTREIF1100 GLENDON AVE 14TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume, eau de toilette, bath oils, body lotions, body cleansers, cosmetics, face creams, facial makeup, foundations, skin moisturizers, face powders, blushes, mascara, eye shadow, eyeliner, lipstick, lip gloss, lip pencil, nail polish, sunscreen, sun block, hair spray, hair conditioner, deodorant, skin lotions, soaps, perfumery, facial lotions, facial cleansers, skin cleansers, body powders, and essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |