USPTO serial 76419565
REACTRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2003
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REACTRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Westwood
E. Westwood Fountainhead Law Group900 Lafayette StreetSuite 509Santa Clara, CA 95050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive media projection device consisting of a motion capture system comprised of computer software and hardware, computer processor, and video projector, for real-time interaction between physical movement and visual images, for use in advertisement, promotional media, entertainment, and video games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 28, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |