Drawing for DEF UNDERGROUND

USPTO serial 76420254

DEF UNDERGROUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEF UNDERGROUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose, Esq.

BRAD D ROSE ESQ PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Record production; audio recording and production; recording studios; music production; videotape production; production of video discs and cassettes for others; music publishing services; entertainment, namely, producing live musical performance; entertainment services, namely, live musical performances by a musician; musical group and musical bandACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 17, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 25, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance