USPTO serial 76420436
AROMA YOGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AROMA YOGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Hsia
Martin Hsia Cades Schutte a limited liability law partnership1000 Bishop Street12th floorHonolulu, HI 96813Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, COMPACTS, CONCEALERS, FOUNDATION, MAKEUP, COSMETIC PENCILS, EYE MAKEUP, EYE MAKEUP REMOVER, FACIAL MAKEUP, MASCARA, MAKEUP REMOVER, EYE PENCILS, EYE SHADOW, EYELINERS, LIP GLOSS, FACE POWDER, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC TISSUES, ROUGE; SKIN CLARIFIERS, SKIN LIGHTENERS, SKIN TONERS, SUN BLOCK PREPARATIONS, SUNTANNING PREPARATIONS, TOILET WATER, WRINKLE REMOVING SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, SPA PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MINERAL BATH SALTS, EYE MASKS, NON-MEDICATED BODY BALM, NON-MEDICATED FOOT CREAM, BODY MOISTURIZERS, BODY, FACE AND FOOT SALT SCRUB, NON-MEDICATED SKIN CREAMS, BODY SALT SCRUBS, FACIAL MASKS, NON-MEDICATED EYE AND THROAT CREAMS, SEA SALT BODY SCRUBS, MOISTURE BALM PUMICE STONES FOR PERSONAL USE, BATH SALT, REHYDRATING BOTANICAL CLEANSING MILK, NON-MEDICATED CELL RENEWAL NIGHT CREAM, SHOWER MINERALS, BATH MINERALS, EXFOLIATING BODY SCRUB, BATH MINERAL CRYSTALS, NON-MEDICATED FACE CREAM, BODY MUD MASK, BATH TABLETS, BATH CRYSTALS, SEA SALTS FOR PERSONAL USE, BODY SPRAY, SHOWER AND BATH GEL, BATH MILK, BATH RICE, FACE AND BODY MUD, BATH MUD, NON-MEDICATED BATH FIZZES CONSISTING OF BAKING SODA AND FRAGRANCE, BUBBLE BATH AND MASSAGE OIL, SKIN MOISTURIZER, NON-MEDICATED MOUTH WASH, NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL POLISH, NIGHT CREAM, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, HAIR DYE, HAIR GEL, HAIR RINSE, HAIR SPRAY, HAND CREAM, FACIAL SCRUBS, BODY CREAM, EYE CREAM, SKIN CLEANSING CREAM, DENITRIFIES, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, LIQUID AND SOLID SOAP FOR THE SKIN, HAND SOAP, BODY SOAP, DEODORANT SOAP, SKIN SOAP, AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS, ANTIPERSPIRANTS, BABY OIL, BATH GEL, SHOWER GEL, TOOTH GEL, BATH POWDER, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, BEAUTY MASKS, BLUSHER, BODY CREAM, BODY OIL, BODY POWDER, BREATH FRESHENER, BUBBLE BATH, COLOGNE, HAIR CONDITIONERS, TONERS, HAIR SHAMPOO, MOISTURIZING SKIN LOTION, BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, AROMA CREAMS, AROMA OILS, AROMA LOTIONS; AND HAIR CLEANING PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wai Lan Yoga Trust, comprising Wail Lan Butler and Sunil Khemaney, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks owned by Wai Lan Yoga Trust, comprising Wail Lan Butler and Sunil Khemaney, both U.S. citizens
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named AROMA YOGA
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |