Drawing for EXECUTIVE RELOCATION

USPTO serial 76420442

EXECUTIVE RELOCATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2763726Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 16, 2003
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXECUTIVE RELOCATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David P. Chameli

David P. Chameli SIRVA, Inc.5001 U.S. Highway 30 WestFort Wayne, IN 46818UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035employee relocation servicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 30, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 23, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 9, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jul 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 23, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 23, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 7, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 15, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 21, 200915AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Sep 10, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Sep 1, 2009E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2009ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 11, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 29, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance