USPTO serial 76420504
BEEF EATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEEF EATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodland Home Products Pty Ltd
New South Wales 2162, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
WAYNE A SIVERTSON NAWROCKI, ROONEY & SIVERTSON, PASTE 401 BROADWAY PL E3433 BROADWAY ST NEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413-3009Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | STOVES, COOKERS, MICROWAVES, OVENS FOR COOKING, ELECTRIC TOASTER OVENS, DOMESTIC COOKING OVENS, BARBEQUES AND GRILLS AND PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |