Drawing for ROYAL PALMS

USPTO serial 76420539

ROYAL PALMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL PALMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arnold B. Silverman

ARNOLD B SILVERMAN ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotel servicesACTIVEOct 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance