Drawing for PROVIDER WEB RESOURCES

USPTO serial 76420601

PROVIDER WEB RESOURCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROVIDER WEB RESOURCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTA I. BURGIN

MARTA I BURGIN ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLPONE METROPOLITAN SQST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036providing insurance related information to health care network physicians over a global computer network in the nature of claim status, member eligibility, and verification of physicians in the networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 27, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance