Drawing for FERN MICHAELS

USPTO serial 76420605

FERN MICHAELS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FERN MICHAELS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Oliver R. Chemin, Esq.

OLIVER R CHEMIN ESQ MCLAUGHLIN & STERN, LLP260 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016series of fictional booksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 26, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 26, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
May 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance