USPTO serial 76420612
ACTONA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTONA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JOSE, CA
LOS GATOS, CA
Los Gatos, CA
Los Gatos, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SALLY M. ABEL
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STSILICON VALLEY CTRMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for accessing and sharing information and data over communications and computer networks; computer software for managing and optimizing the operation of computer servers and networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Monitoring the computer systems and computer networks of others for technical purposes; technical support and consulting services in the fields of computer software, computer hardware, and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ACTONA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VersEdge Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VersEdge Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ACTONA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |