USPTO serial 76420717
ZODIAC BOYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZODIAC BOYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Studio City, CA
Studio City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER, PATTON, LEE & UTECHT, LLP6060 CTR DR TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | SERIES OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOONS AND/OR LIVE ACTION ADVENTURE; TELEVISION PROGRAMMING FEATURING EXHIBITION OF FILMS AND VIDEO TAPES; MOVIE THEATER SERVICES, NAMELY, THE EXHIBITION OF FILMS AND VIDEO TAPES IN THEATERS; PROVIDING A WEB SITE FEATURING ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT PRIMARILY IN THE NATURE OF INTERACTIVE ANIMATION, COMICS, PUZZLES AND GAMES; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF WRITING, STORYTELLING AND ART FOR AND IN RELATION TO THE COMIC BOOK AND ANIMATION INDUSTRIES AND IN THE FIELD OF INTERACTIVE AND CONFIDENCE GAMES, AND CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS AND GAMES USED FOR TEACHING TEAMWORK, COMMUNICATION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION; AND OTHER SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |