Drawing for C SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76420779

C SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHEFFIELD, SHARI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with C SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWR ONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for interconnecting, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks and telephony systems; telephones; telephone headsets; electronic communication devices; wireless communication devices; cellular and wireless telephones; telecommunications equipment; telephony systems,ACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services; providing online information in the field of telecommunications and telephony systems; telecommunications integration services,ACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely classroom training, workshops, conferences, seminars, for computer networking, broadband networks, computer systems, telecommunications systems, IP telephony; Entertainment services namely broadcasting across broadband networks; testing services to determine professional skills in the filed of networking, computer systems, telecommunication systems, IP telephony; online services, namely providing information on online commerce, computer networks, broadband networks, testing, computer systems, telecommunication systems, IP telephony systemsACTIVE—
042Computer consulting and support services; customer support services in connection with computer hardware, computer software, computer networking equipment and services, telephony systems, telecommunication equipment, IP telephony, broadcasting across broadband networks; telecommunication systems; computer network design,ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance