USPTO serial 76420882
E-LLEGIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3142499Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2006
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E-LLEGIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RENO, NV
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the sale of credit card and smart card accounts through the administration of incentive award programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 8, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOYALTY CENTRAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART CHIP TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SMART CHIP TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SMART CHIP TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named E-LLEGIANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2006 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NAUD | SU - NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |