USPTO serial 76420925
DETAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DETAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Uxbridge UB8 1HR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER B KUNIN
PETER B KUNIN DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STP O BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Database management software, namely, software for use in transferring bulk databases, transferring database changes, and tracking database changes in the fields of data warehouse implementation, customer relationship marketing programs, enterprise resource planning systems, and wherein such software transfers data either in bulk or as transitional packets between software applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |