USPTO serial 76420961
QUANTITATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUANTITATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC T. FINGERHUT
ERIC T FINGERHUT SHAWPITTMAN LLP2300 N ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, CALCULATING, EVALUATING AND PROVIDING RISK ASSESSMENT, RATING AND CLAIM INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS BASED ON EMPIRICAL DATA ELEMENTS AND ALGORITHMS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CREDIT, MOTOR VEHICLE REPORTS, MEDICAL, PRESCRIPTION, AND HEALTH-RELATED INFORMATION OF THE INDIVIDUALS AND USED BY OTHERS FOR INSURANCE UNDERWRITING, RATING, CLAIMS, AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE ACCESSIBLE TO OTHERS VIA A COMPUTER NETWORKS, THAT PERMITS THE CALCULATION AND EVALUATION OF INSURANCE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS AND THAT PROVIDES CLAIM ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS OF INDIVIDUALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quantitative Data Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Quantitative Data Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QUANTITATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |