Drawing for TOPSAFE

USPTO serial 76421004

TOPSAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOPSAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

V. T. Giordano

V T GIORDANO VON MALTITZ, DERENBERG, KUNIN, JANSSEN60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012motor vehicle seats and motor vehicle children's seatsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 29, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 9, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 9, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 5, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 26, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance