USPTO serial 76421040
FAMILY AFFAIR BUFFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAMILY AFFAIR BUFFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carlo F. Van den Bosch; Yael Karabelnik; Michelle M. LaVoie; Timothy L. Epp; Brian M. Daucher
CARLO F VAN DEN BOSCH YAEL KARABELNIK SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP4TH FL650 TOWN CTR DRCOSTA MESA, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Christmas tree ornaments except confectionery or illumination articles; dolls, doll clothing and doll accessories, toy tea sets, board games, and toys, namely, collectible toy figures, toy figurines and accessories therefor, stuffed toys, toy bakeware and cookware, bath toys, music box toys, musical toys, paper dolls, party favors in the nature of small toys, plush toys, puppets, drawing toys, toy jewelry making kits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |