USPTO serial 76421106
COUTURE CJ JUNKIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUTURE CJ JUNKIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel,
SALLY M ABEL, FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, Perfume Lipstick, Eye shadow, Blush, Moisturizer, eye pencils | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, Rings, Earrings,Necklaces, Bracelets | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 018 | Handbags | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | T shirts, Dress shirts, Blouses, Sweaters, Jackets, Vests, Shorts, Pants, Jeans, Skirts, underwear, Bras, panties, lingerie, Belts, Gloves, Scarves, Coats, Footwear, Shoes, Sandals, Slippers, Sneakers, Boots, Ski Boots, Formal Dress Shoes, HeadGear Hats, And Caps; In addition Socks, Hosiery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VITOLO-JUMELLE, CAMILLE
- Other trademarks owned by VITOLO-JUMELLE, CAMILLE
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named COUTURE CJ JUNKIE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |