USPTO serial 76421114
AQUAFTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUAFTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tortola, VG
BALASHIHINSKLY REGION RU-143980, RU
BALASHIHINSKLY REGION RU-143980, RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Virgil H. Marsh
VIRGIL H MARSH FISHER, CHRISTEN & SABOL1156 15TH ST NWSTE 603WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in the manufacture of cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Soaps, namely, deodorant soaps, skin soaps, facial soaps, body soaps, perfume, essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; makeup preparation, namely, make up face powders, mascara, cosmetic pencils and lipsticks; hair lotions; hair shampoos; sun tan lotions; shaving preparations; cosmetic preparation for slimming purposes; bath products, namely, bath salts not for medical purposes; bath foam; cosmetic preparations for skin care; makeup removing preparations; beauty masks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JENDA LTD
- Other trademarks owned by FABERLIC SA
- Other trademarks owned by FABERLIC SA
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named AQUAFTEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |