USPTO serial 76421172
DENOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3024984Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2005
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DENOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin W. Schiffmiller
MARTIN W. SCHIFFMILLER KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER & PIERON425 FIFTH AVENUE5TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016-2223Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DNA SEQUENCERS, SOMATIC HYBRIDIZERS, PROTEIN SEQUENCERS AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSFERRING GENES FROM OUTSIDE OF THE CELL INTO THE CELL, NAMELY, GENE TRANSFER INSTRUMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |