USPTO serial 76421333
SMART INTERCONNECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2890491Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2004
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART INTERCONNECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milpitas, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Lee Taylor
Jennifer Lee Taylor MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used as a development tool for use in the design of integrated circuits; micronetworks for use in the design of integrated circuits; system-level protocol cores and device drivers for use in consumer electronics, communications and computers; software application design tools for use in design of integrated circuits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Technical consulting and technical support services in the field of integrated circuit design ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |