Drawing for MIRRORFLASH

USPTO serial 76421654

MIRRORFLASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRRORFLASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James D. Halsey

DAVID M PITCHER STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES, LARGE SCALE INTEGRATED (LSI) CHIPS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (ICs), IC MEMORY CARDS, MEMORY CHIPS and MICROPROCESSOR CHIPSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 12, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance