USPTO serial 76421738
OMNIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMNIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sheldon, Birmingham, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERYN ACE FUHRER
ERYN ACE FUHRER TWIN OAKS ESTATESHAHN LOESER & PARK LLP1225 W MARKET STAKRON, OH 44313Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Cooking apparatus, installations, and appliances and parts and fittings therefore, namely, kettles, electric and gas ranges, electric cooking ovens,convection ovens, gas and electric stoves, electric grills, and refrigerators | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Metal cooking pans, frying pans, grilling pans, casserole dishes, and trivets | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of kitchen appliances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |