USPTO serial 76421805
TI3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TI3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. Vickrey
DAVID H VICKREY AKZO NOBEL INCINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT7 LIVINGSTONE AVEDOBBS FERRY, NY 10522-3408Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Industrial protective and decorative coatings and industrial non-stick coatings for use in the manufacture of cookware, bakeware, ovenware, small electrical and small kitchen appliances | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Small electrical and small kitchen appliances, namely electric toasters, electric toaster ovens, electric coffee makers, convection ovens, commercial cooking ovens, dehumidifiers, air conditioning units | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cookware, bakeware and ovenware having a non-stick coating, namely roasting pans, baking dishes, cooking pots, frying pans, skillets and cake pans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Akzo Nobel Coatings Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named TI3
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |