USPTO serial 76421819
TUBULAR SOLUTIONS FROM THE TUBULAR EXPERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340424Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TUBULAR SOLUTIONS FROM THE TUBULAR EXPERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward H. Jones
Edward H. Jones United States Steel Corporation600 Grant StreetRoom 1500Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2800Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical consultation services and engineering services, namely, engineering and metallurgical consultation regarding metallic pipes, metal tubing and steel casing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 17, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LONE STAR STEEL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by LONE STAR STEEL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by LONE STAR STEEL COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TUBULAR SOLUTIONS FROM THE TUBULAR EXPERTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |