USPTO serial 76421947
GRAVITY GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAVITY GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY &701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |