USPTO serial 76422098
CALIFORNIA BREAD FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALIFORNIA BREAD FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Torrance, CA
Torrance, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman
CHRISTINE L LOFGREN JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS, 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | DREID FRUITS; SPREADS, NAMELY VEGETABLE BASED SPREADS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | BAKERY GOODS; BREAD AND BAGELS; FLOUR AND PREPARATIONS MADE FROM CEREALS, NAMELY, PROCESSED CEREALS, BREAD, PASTRY AND CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY CONFECTIONERY CHIPS FOR BAKING; MUFFINS; SCONES; BISCUITS; COOKIES; PASTRIES; CAKES, DOUGHNUTS; TURNOVERS; CINNAMON ROLLS, SWEET ROLLS AND READY-TO MAKE MIXES OF THE SAME; CAKES AND COOKIES THAT CONTAIN ADDED NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMINS AND MINERALS; PACKAGED FOODS, NAMELY MEALS AND CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA OR RICE, PACKAGED SANDWICHES AND PREPARED FOODS, NAMELY MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA OR RICE; CHOCOLATE AND CONFECTIONERY ITEMS, NAMELY, CONFECTIONERY CHIPS FOR BAKING; GRANOLA; HONEY; YEAST; BAKING POWDER; SALT; MUSTARD, VINEGAR, SAUCES; SEASONINGS; FOOD FLAVORINGS EXCLUSIVE OF FLAVORINGS MADE OF ESSENTIAL OILS; RICE, HUSKED OATS, HUSKED BARLEY, EDIBLE FLOUR, EDIBLE GLUTEN, PROCESSED GRAINS; INSTANT CONFECTIONARY MIX; ICE CREAM MIX, SHERBERT MIX; ALMOND PASTE; YEAST POWDERS; MALT; PREPARATIONS FOR STIFFENING WHIPPED CREAM; ICES; ICE CREAM; SHERBERT, SORBET, GROUND WHOLE BEAN COFFEE, CHOCOLATE AND COCOA; COFFEE AND ESPRESSO BEVERAGES AND BEVERAGES MADE WITH BASE OF COFFEE, ESPRESSO, AND MILK; POWERED FLAVORINGS, FOOD FLAVORING SYRUPS; SAGO; TREACLE; ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; SPICES; TEA; HERB TEA, NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SOFT DRINKS AND SYRUPS AND CONCENTRATES FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF; FRUIT FLAVORED DRINKS; FRUIT FLAVORED DRINKS FLAVORED WITH TEA; CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT AND VEGETABLE JUICES, DRINKS AND SMOOTHIES; COFFEE FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS AND SYRUPS AND EXTRACTS FOR MAKING FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS; SPORTS DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL BAKERY SHOP SERVICES; WHOLESALE SUPPLY STORES, RETAIL OUTLETS AND DISTRIBUTORSHIPS FEATURING GROUND AND WHOLE BEAN COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, COFFEE AND ESPRESSO BEVERAGES AND BEVERAGES MADE WITH A BASE OF COFFEE, ESPRESSO, AND MILK, POWDERED FLAVORINGS, FLAVORING SYRUPS, AND BAKED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | RESTAURANT SERVICES; CATERING SERVICES; CATERING SERVICES FOR THE PROVIDING OF FOOD AND DRINKS FOR OTHERS; COFFEE CAFE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tei Fu Chen Family Trust, a California trust, the trustees comprising Oi-Lin Chen and Tei-Fu Chen are both U.S. citizens, The
- Other trademarks owned by Tei Fu Chen Family Trust, a California trust, the trustees comprising Oi-Lin Chen and Tei-Fu Chen are both U.S. citizens, The
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CALIFORNIA BREAD FACTORY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |