USPTO serial 76422113
ER EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ER EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Ludovici-Lint, Esq.
JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT ESQ MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, computer disaster recovery planning; hosting of digital content on the Internet; online hosting of bills, statements and other documents in electronic form on computer networks; providing electronic backup records of bills, statements and other documents on the Internet; technical support services, namely, monitoring of document network systems and troubleshooting of problems associated with online access to electronic records; telephone information services featuring information in the field of online access to user records; disaster recovery services in the nature of online notification of alternative and backup communications; and data conversion of computer program data or information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BELL & HOWELL MAIL AND MESSAGING TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by BELL & HOWELL MAIL AND MESSAGING TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ER EXPRESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |