USPTO serial 76422354
ROSETTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3139430Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 2006
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROSETTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Menlo Park, CA
Menlo Park, CA
Menlo Park, CA
Princeton, NJ
Princeton, NJ
Princeton, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vanessa A. Ignacio, Esq.
VANESSA A IGNACIO ESQ LOWENSTEIN SANDLER PC65 LIVINGSTON AVEROSELAND, NJ 07068-1791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FISCAL MARKET ASSESSMENT IN THE TECHNOLOGY FIELD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 19, 2002 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS; TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES TO CLIENTS IN THE NATURE OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 19, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SRI International
- Other trademarks owned by SRI International
- Other trademarks owned by SRI International
- Other trademarks owned by Sarnoff Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sarnoff Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sarnoff Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ROSETTEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |