Drawing for CHIC KIT

USPTO serial 76422450

CHIC KIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIC KIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. McGovern, Esq.

Jeffrey B. McGovern720 South Powerline RoadSuuite DDeerfield Beach, FL 33442

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely nail lacquer, eye-shadow pots, eye-shadow pencils, lip gloss, eye liner, lip liner and lipstickACTIVE—
009mouse padsACTIVE—
025clothing namely T-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance